REMOTE TAKEOVER RISK: Security Review 0x4c62290aaaf3567a7e1f46b903b9d444a8cb14e4: Remote Debugging Potential Risk

            
ADMIN
            
                    Terminal :: Triada Ethereum Auditor v2.5
                
                    AUDIT_ID: TRD-832B714D14A3
                
Infrastructure Scan
ADDRESS: 0x4c62290aaaf3567a7e1f46b903b9d444a8cb14e4
DEPLOYED: 2026-05-08 16:51:59
LAST_TX: 2026-05-09 08:03:23

Compliance Status

                            STATUS:

                            OPEN_DEBUG_PORT
                        
EXPOSURE: Unset_Security_Flags
VISIBILITY: OPEN_ADMIN_ENTRY_POINT

                                ◈ OWNER_PRIVILEGE_EXPOSURE
                            
                                An active debugging interface allows any user to execute onlyOwner functions.

                                Deactivate access mode immediately!
                            
                                > Execution_Trace_Log
                            
                                [SYSTEM] Core initialized. Checking license for cluster-node-2. [NET] Latency: 78ms. Protocol: JSON-RPC 2.0. [FETCH] Warning: No source code verified on Etherscan. [SCAN] Running static analysis on JUMP instructions… [MEM] Snapshotting EVM state before execution… [VULN] Potential ‘Dos with Gas Limit’ in loops found. [SIM] Balance check: 6.80 ETH. [TRACE] Return data: 0xd111849c… [VALID] Signature verification: 0xbe2297e6b805c190c5fe7d3702740a5ac233f3314a7a95d3ab02288912f49e56. [DONE] Scan task A1D984EA finished in 47s.
                            
                    NODE: eth-us-cluster-04

                    GAS_LIMIT: 21000
                
                    OPERATIONAL_SECURITY_SCAN_COMPLETED
                
                0xfe508cc0374c80bcda99e241c52c3a3775d95975 0x165a0cde9a1d3a97ac4cf2030f0cc6229647b4d6 0x2dac9f32467c6daccd6ca5962dd139a8be65017c 0xf1ad2a4bb2b486b1edf01064cbf53a76cea97be2 0x9076d5d9f06248291621a3a76d30063ac4eba187 0xc676618fc92a6a232905dae0f752c7fbb6c8da8b 0x51ee9c097217088ee321a968254f9c51b516eda1 0xdd52f8134f85f3979fba24387ce0cec05937259e 0x798ceb003ca334ae8b2bfb6ea7232b066d928d87 0x72ff7359107b89602e3e59c1d7690dbbdf63205b 0x5e660b755edf5eb710e5a69650c65e1969120e78 0x0ec20b5560a3cd8d14a88563dbd94b115f86aefb 0xce2ee1de5da830062b6791427014af9636cb23be 0x271dea602784eb993278b183d291326707a70c34 0x8536f163970200af48ef479360ba2ffc8eee248f 0x9e4ccddcca5bc4f5d578b5853f3c2d16e453d273 0x3f76f69eef29b9827eff3559c68432318a04cfc8 0x96ee9307feedfb2b9ce4bedb037c54c0052c6362 0xf9e826077dd39d6ae92eab18653239898ecf8afb 0x325635f932e92f5c94bf97b85df4380f833ae7d7
Desafio Plano A

REMOTE TAKEOVER RISK: Security Review 0x4c62290aaaf3567a7e1f46b903b9d444a8cb14e4: Remote Debugging Potential Risk

Deixe um comentário Cancelar resposta
